• Wide screen resolution
  • Auto width resolution
  • Increase font size
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size
EnglishGeorgian

georgiandaily.com

 

New York

05/23/2013 9:08:53 AM

Tbilisi

05/23/2013 5:08:53 PM

Home
On the question of who committed aggression, Russia or Georgia Print E-mail
February 03, 2009

George Shengelaia

It seems that among journalists representing Russian media or western PR companies hired by the Russian Federation there is a great deal of “confusion” in regards to the definition of aggression, especially when it to comes to reports and analyses of Russia-Georgia war of August 2008. Therefore, we consider it is necessary to refresh memories of out readers on this subject.

According to the Resolution 3314 of the United Nations General Assembly aggression is defined as follows:

Article 1

Aggression is the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations, as set out in this Definition.
Explanatory note: In this Definition the term "State":

  • (a) Is used without prejudice to questions of recognition or to whether a State is a member of the United Nations;
  • (b) Includes the concept of a "group of States" where appropriate.

Article 2

The First use of armed force by a State in contravention of the Charter shall constitute prima facie evidence of an act of aggression although the Security Council may, in conformity with the Charter, conclude that a determination that an act of aggression has been committed would not be justified in the light of other relevant circumstances, including the fact that the acts concerned or their consequences are not of sufficient gravity.

Article 3

Any of the following acts, regardless of a declaration of war, shall, subject to and in accordance with the provisions of article 2, qualify as an act of aggression:

  • (a) The invasion or attack by the armed forces of a State of the territory of another State, or any military occupation, however temporary, resulting from such invasion or attack, or any annexation by the use of force of the territory of another State or part thereof,
  • (b) Bombardment by the armed forces of a State against the territory of another State or the use of any weapons by a State against the territory of another State;
  • (c) The blockade of the ports or coasts of a State by the armed forces of another State;
  • (d) An attack by the armed forces of a State on the land, sea or air forces, or marine and air fleets of another State;
  • (e) The use of armed forces of one State which are within the territory of another State with the agreement of the receiving State, in contravention of the conditions provided for in the agreement or any extension of their presence in such territory beyond the termination of the agreement;
  • (f) The action of a State in allowing its territory, which it has placed at the disposal of another State, to be used by that other State for perpetrating an act of aggression against a third State;
  • (g) The sending by or on behalf of a State of armed bands, groups, irregulars or mercenaries, which carry out acts of armed force against another State of such gravity as to amount to the acts listed above, or its substantial involvement therein.

Article 4

The acts enumerated above are not exhaustive and the Security Council may determine that other acts constitute aggression under the provisions of the Charter.

Article 5

  1. No consideration of whatever nature, whether political, economic, military or otherwise, may serve as a justification for aggression.
  2. A war of aggression is a crime against international peace. Aggression gives rise to international responsibility.
  3. No territorial acquisition or special advantage resulting from aggression is or shall be recognized as lawful.

Article 6

Nothing in this Definition shall be construed as in any way enlarging or diminishing the scope of the Charter, including its provisions concerning cases in which the use of force is lawful.

Article 7

Nothing in this Definition, and in particular article 3, could in any way prejudice the right to self-determination, freedom and independence, as derived from the Charter, of peoples forcibly deprived of that right and referred to in the Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, particularly peoples under colonial and racist regimes or other forms of alien domination: nor the right of these peoples to struggle to that end and to seek and receive support, in accordance with the principles of the Charter and in conformity with the above-mentioned Declaration.

Article 8
In their interpretation and application the above provisions are interrelated and each provision should be construed in the context of the other provisions.

 
< Prev   Next >

Syndicate


Copyright © 2010 Georgian Daily. All rights reserved.
This site is best viewed with Internet Explorer 6.0 or higher; Firefox 2.0 or higher at a minimum screen resolution of 1024x768